Mahmoud Zeraatpishe; atefe Ranjbar darestani
Volume 5, Issue 2 , September 2014, , Pages 55-69
Abstract
A fortiori logic is a kind of formal logic which its arguments, unlike the common arguments of Aristotelian logic, has four terms through which after comparing usually two persons, things, works to each other, the description of one of them is ascribed/ denied to/ from the other. This logic, in spite ...
Read More
A fortiori logic is a kind of formal logic which its arguments, unlike the common arguments of Aristotelian logic, has four terms through which after comparing usually two persons, things, works to each other, the description of one of them is ascribed/ denied to/ from the other. This logic, in spite of Sion’s belief, is found in Quran, so richly that we can say that it is the prominent logic of Quran. In this research, I will study a fortiori logic in Quran, after giving an introductory explanation of it.
Mahmoud Zeraatpisheh; ghasemali kochenani
Volume 2, Issue 2 , September 2011, , Pages 97-116
Abstract
In dealing with uninvited guests as natural propositions and propositions that are based on primary essential predication, the term “predication” has undergone some semantic changes; according to the elements of “unity” and “difference” three periods may be distinguished: ...
Read More
In dealing with uninvited guests as natural propositions and propositions that are based on primary essential predication, the term “predication” has undergone some semantic changes; according to the elements of “unity” and “difference” three periods may be distinguished: (1) the period in which “what causes the unity” is external and “what causes the difference” is in the mind, (2) the period in which “the unifier”, in addition to its being in the outside world, may be in mind too and “the differing factor”, also, moves to the top level of mind or another mind, (3) the period in which “the unifier” and “the differing factor”, besides in viewed and viewer, may regularly be located in viewer and viewed. Without separating these periods, the theory of “distinction of the predications” in Mulla Sadra’s works cannot correctly be read. In this article, in fact, “what causes the unity” and “what causes the difference” will be analyzed in a historical development so that some parts of obscurities about this theory may be removed.
